The File Cabinet of Regret

Affectionate parody. Skepticism with a smile. Geometry everywhere.

← Return to Home Page

Every new idea gets compared to things it isn’t. This page is where those comparisons go to rest. Think of it as a Mulder-style drawer: filled with oddities, but filed neatly under “Not Swarm Field Theory.”

Case File Index

  1. Case File #1 — Does this theory blow up Modern Physics?
  2. Case File #2 — Aliens
  3. Case File #3 — UFO propulsion & antigravity
  4. Case File #4 — Perpetual motion
  5. Case File #5 — Crystals, vibes, and quantum healing
  6. Case File #6 — Bigfoot
  7. Case File #7 — The Bermuda Triangle
  8. Case File #8 — The Stock Market
  9. Case File #9 — Astrology
  10. Case File #10 — Time Travel
  11. Case File #11 — Simulation Theory
  12. Case File #12 — Elvis
  13. Case File #13 — The Force
Case File #1 — Does this theory blow up Modern Physics?

No. Swarm Field Theory does not “blow up” modern physics. Relativity and quantum mechanics remain valid within their domains. What the lattice picture does is provide a deeper geometric substrate that explains why those laws look the way they do, and why the constants of nature take the values we measure. It complements physics rather than replaces it.

Case File #2 — Aliens

No. There are no aliens here — not even 25% fewer. Just membranes, zero nodes, and geometry.

Case File #3 — UFO propulsion & antigravity

No. The lattice isn’t a secret engine. Swarm Field Theory explains why constants (like c, Planck’s constant, and G) have the values we measure. It doesn’t promise starships; it offers geometry that matches experiments.

Case File #4 — Perpetual motion

No. Conservation laws remain intact. The lattice doesn’t mint free energy; it explains why the laws hold in the first place.

Case File #5 — Crystals, vibes, and quantum healing

No. This is mathematics and testable derivations, not wellness claims. Numbers you can check, not chakras.

Case File #6 — Bigfoot

He doesn’t fit. Bigfoot is not a zero node, not a membrane intersection, and not a hidden projection artifact. At most, he is an emergent biological swarm walking on the lattice like the rest of us. The only constant Bigfoot proves is that blurry photos are universal.

Case File #7 — The Bermuda Triangle

No. The lattice doesn’t eat ships or airplanes. If there’s a triangle in Swarm Field Theory, it’s the geometry of membranes meeting at an angle — not a paranormal maritime hazard.

Case File #8 — The Stock Market

Unfortunately not. While the lattice may govern space, time, and the constants of physics, it refuses to untangle human behavior. If you try to derive Wall Street dynamics from zero nodes, you’ll end up with zero dollars.

Case File #9 — Astrology

No. The positions of stars don’t influence your love life through lattice membranes. Swarm Field Theory explains how photons get from stars to telescopes, not whether Mercury retrograde affects your commute.

Case File #10 — Time Travel

No flux capacitors here. The lattice defines real space and enforces the universal speed limit c. Temporal tourism remains in the domain of Hollywood.

Case File #11 — Simulation Theory

No. The lattice is not a computer, a server farm, or a VR headset. It is geometry. If you want to call it a simulation, fine — but it’s one with no exit menu and no patch updates.

Case File #12 — Elvis

No. Zero nodes have no interior, no dimensions, and no Las Vegas comeback tours. Elvis has left the lattice.

Case File #13 — The Force

Tempting, but no. The lattice doesn’t bind the galaxy with mystical energy. It defines the geometry of real space, not Jedi mind tricks. (Though, like Yoda, it does insist: “Do. Or do not. There is no try.”)

Tribute note: Any cultural references (e.g. Mulder) are made with admiration — the writing and cinematography of The X-Files remain among the best ever on television. This page is non-commercial, parody in spirit, and no endorsement is implied. Any requests to rename or adjust this page will be handled respectfully and transparently.

→ Read the Geometry page

👽
What are you looking at?